Satoshi Nakamoto is Not an Individual.
A Delusion of the Great Man Theory
The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, has captivated the cryptocurrency community ever since its invention in 2008. Given the recent HBO documentary, Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery, which focuses on the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto and peddles the hypothesis that former Bitcoin developer Peter Todd is the enigmatic figure behind Satoshi Nakamoto, I thought it’d be a good time to share my hypothesis surrounding the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. Personally, the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto being an individual seems neither feasible nor grounded in reality to me. Rather, I believe it is most likely that Satoshi Nakamoto is a pseudonym for a significantly large group that worked together to develop Bitcoin. Before going into my hypothesis, I’ve provided a brief yet comprehensive background explainer describing the processes, systems, mechanisms, and technologies comprising the design of Bitcoin.
Technical Background on Bitcoin
As the first decentralized cryptocurrency, Bitcoin was meticulously designed to operate through a network of interconnected nodes in a peer-to-peer (P2P) system. Each node participates in verifying and recording transactions using advanced cryptographic techniques. Bitcoin utilizes a blockchain—a decentralized, cryptographically secured distributed-ledger where each block contains timestamped transactions and the hash of the previous block, forming an immutable chain that ensures transparency and tamper-resistance.
Transactions are secured using cryptographic hash functions, specifically the SHA-256 algorithm, which originated out of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) and published in 2001. This algorithm transforms input data into a fixed-size string of characters, making it computationally infeasible to reverse-engineer or alter the original data without detection. Each block in the blockchain references the hash of the preceding block, creating a continuous and unalterable chain of information.
Consensus across the network is achieved through a mechanism known as Proof-of-Work (PoW). In this system, network participants called miners compete to solve complex mathematical puzzles, which involve finding a nonce (a random number) that, when combined with the block's data and passed through the SHA-256 hash function, produces a hash that meets a predetermined difficulty level—typically requiring a specific number of leading zeros. This process is computationally intensive and demands significant computational power, ensuring that adding new blocks to the blockchain is a resource-intensive endeavor.
Bitcoin mining serves two crucial functions: validating transactions and introducing new bitcoins into circulation as a reward for the miners' efforts. The mining difficulty adjusts approximately every two weeks to maintain an average block creation time of about ten minutes. This self-regulating system controls the supply of Bitcoin and secures the network against malicious activities by making it prohibitively expensive to manipulate the blockchain.
By integrating these technologies—decentralized P2P networking, cryptographic hashing, consensus mechanisms, and mining—Bitcoin establishes a robust and secure system for financial transactions without the need for centralized authorities or intermediaries. This innovation effectively disrupts the traditional centralized commercial banking system by providing a transparent, decentralized alternative that is resistant to censorship and manipulation.
In an embodiment of Joseph Schumpeter's concept of creative destruction, Bitcoin represents a technological revolution that redefines the financial industry. Schumpeter described creative destruction as the "process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one." Bitcoin harnessed this power of innovation to challenge and potentially supplant the highly centralized power of traditional banking institutions, which have historically held sole responsibility for managing financial transactions. By designing a system where consensus is achieved through decentralized computation rather than centralized oversight, Bitcoin exemplified the disruptive impact of creative destruction in modern economic systems during the Information Age.
Satoshi Nakamoto: A Different Hypothesis
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Void to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.